I always looked forward to the start of a new school year when I was a kid. To me, being in a new grade, in a new classroom, with a different set of kids than I was with the year before was a chance for a "new start". I remember thinking, "Maybe this year will be different than last year." I don't know exactly what difference I was looking for, but a fresh page of life seems to brim with possibilities.
That's kind of how we feel at the start of a new year, isn't it? Some of us will arrive at the end of 2012 and be sorry to see it go. Others of us have been ready to put this particular year behind us for some time. Whatever the case, this January 1 like every January 1 will carry a sense of "new beginnings" with it.
And then? Haha - after a few weeks, the joke's on us! Once we discover that a new year hasn't magically strengthened our willpower, that we still have the same bad habits and hindrances and burdens and tendencies (because wherever you go, there you are - still) and the year may be new, but much remains the same.
That's because many of us live life as if it were luck: "Maybe I'll win the lottery", "Maybe I'll meet the love of my life", "Maybe I'll land the perfect job/buy the perfect house/discover the secret to happiness" and we ignore the fact that Christians, of all people, should not be creatures of fate.
Christians do stuff. (I know, profound.) Sin and heartache and exploitation and destructiveness are on the move, so we need to be on the move against it. And what did Jesus say? That the gates of hell would not prevail against His church.
I've been thinking a lot about efforts to change the world lately, as we gear up for a first-time event with our 4th-6th graders called "A New Year for a New World" on New Year's Eve. Is there something distinctive about Christian efforts at world change? Is there something that makes Christ necessary in all of it? Or can any well-intentioned person make the same impact? After all, it's the Holiday Season, and for every recent story of tragedy or of a family who can't afford Christmas, we're bound to hear one about someone who stepped up to make things happy for them.
But that's the problem with these headline-grabbing relief efforts - they're short-term, and they're focused on restoring happiness. Sometimes I wonder if it's our happiness that's really in view. As in, "Oh, I can't bear to see those poor people suffering...let me do something for them," and then we pitch in until our own feelings of discomfort go away. Don't get me wrong. People were wonderfully generous after Hurricane Katrina, and Sandy, and the earthquake in Haiti and the Tsunami in Japan. But those natural disasters have become so common (to say nothing of man-made tragedies like school shootings) we can barely keep them straight. (Remember what happened in Joplin? I didn't. Look it up.) And the Red Cross, among other organizations, does wonderful long-term recovery work at disaster sites.
But I think back to benefit dinners or concerts that have been held for people I know who got sick or injured, all the time and money and attention that got poured into a single event, and then I reflect on the fact that that person is still sick. No one gets out of the woods because of one benefit event. Meanwhile, our collective consciousness has moved on, in part because we can't stand to dwell on suffering, in part because our brains can only remember so much.
I think what God furnishes to these efforts to help the world is this. First, he elevates and has elevated and will continue to elevate the status of human beings so that we bother to notice suffering and want to help at all. Christianity (and yes, I'm partisan) really doesn't get enough credit for the impact it has had historically on human rights and dignity. The influence of Christianity helped end two particularly heinous practices that had become accepted in the Roman Empire - infanticide and child sexual abuse, established the first orphanages and hospitals, advocated for the end of slavery and more humane treatment of the mentally ill, and promoted widespread education of the populace at government expense. We take these things for granted now. Then articles like this one jolt me back into consciousness and remind me we have a long way to go.
And then, after we've convinced that we should care, he gives us the resources to care. It's one thing to drop a quarter into a panhandler's cup. It's another thing to take the time to get to know them. It's still another thing to have the perseverance and the resourcefulness and the patience to walk alongside him to better his life. A few people I know seem to have what it takes. Most of us don't.
And so what God can furnish to us (can furnish) is the promise to make us like him. And the benefit of that is that God is a giving God. He gave us the world - he didn't have to. He gave you your life - but he didn't have to. He made the earth habitable, with just the right mixture of gases in the air and tolerable temperature extremes. When we mistreated each other, he gave us another chance. When he came to earth as a person himself, we mistreated him. Again, he gave us mercy. When the power of death was dismantled, he then gave us an invitation. And he gives his Spirit, his power and nature, to those who believe in him. He gives and gives and gives. We just give - and then we need a break. A one-time act of kindness is good, and I'll take it; but a revolution of kindness is built by faithfulness, one brick at a time.
On New Year's Eve, we won't change the world. Shame on us if we communicate that "because of this night, everything is different" and the work is done. If kids don't leave feeling motivated to keep giving of themselves, we will have fallen short. All we can hope to accomplish in 16 hours is to get the ball rolling, to excite kids' spirits and awaken their imaginations to what if? And of course, at some point, we all top out in kindness. We all top out in generosity. We all top out in patience. It's at that point that we need inspiration, and we need help.
The promise of a new world is grounded in God, who in Revelation 21 tells John that he is making everything new. The hope of the world now is to bring a taste of that future into the present. That's the essence of the kingdom of God. The transposition that brings the end of the story into the middle yields some pretty radical ripple effects. It is by those effects alone that we can say another year has any hope of being "new". Otherwise it's just the same old.
Monday, December 17, 2012
Saturday, December 15, 2012
The Words When There Are No Words
On Wednesday, when “that terrible thing in Oregon” was mentioned
in conversation, someone else asked, “What happened in Oregon?” They hadn’t heard
about the gunman who opened fire at a shopping mall outside Portland, killing
two people. What’s sad is that in another week or two, lots of us will struggle
to remember “what happened in Oregon?” because our attention has already been
torn away, to another horrible and unfathomable shooting.
I’m referring, of course, to what happened Friday morning at
Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut: 20 kids and 7 adults murdered in a shooting rampage that lasted only a few minutes and has no readily apparent motive. The blogosphere and
social media sites exploded around 10 a.m., with more than a few of the
reactions reflecting the sentiment that, “There are no words.”
That’s understandable, coming from a nation worn out by what
happened twice this week, and in September in Minneapolis, and in August at
Texas A&M, and in July at the movie theater in Aurora, Colorado, and on two
separate occasions this year in Wisconsin, to name a few. But, like many
conclusions we grasp at when tension runs high, it’s wrong.
It turns out that there are
words, plenty of them. And those words will heal us.
Words make the abstract concrete, assigning some meaning to what are otherwise just nebulous feelings. I used words like "horrible" and "unfathomable" in the first paragraph of this post, and they are clues as to how I'm processing this. Notice that, sadly, I didn't use the word "shocking". Apparently I've come to accept that "these things happen", and I hate that that's the case.
We all try to make sense of the world we live in. Kids do this too. Confusion is unsettling; clarity, comforting. Words have to be spoken at
a time like this, because it’s not as if the jumble of feelings will just iron
themselves out. It doesn’t work that way.
I’ve never understood people who try to prescribe or preempt
what we are and aren’t allowed to express in the wake of a tragic death. It’s
usually "out of respect for the families", which is noble, but the truth is that
death is death, and both its finality and the way it comes unlocks
certain things in each of us that otherwise aren’t acknowledged. Words need to
flow freely at a time like this, to bring the inside out. Sometimes the words are imprecise, but every attempt at verbalization brings us closer to a realization of what we're dealing with. Sometimes the words are raw,
because they reflect the torment raging inside of us.
Two years ago, the thing-that’s-not-supposed-to-happen-here
happened here, in Carlsbad, California. Friday’s incident reawakened feelings
of panic in parents who had been a part of that. Everyone at that time felt
lucky that no one had been killed. How lucky did they feel on Friday, faced
with the reminder that what they went through could have been so much worse? (I’ll answer that:
extremely lucky.) And there were lots of words spoken back then, many of them
redundant, some of them over-the-top, but all of them valid.
President Obama spoke Friday after the shooting, reacting “not
as a president, but as a parent.” He was applauded by some for keeping his remarks constrained to the human side of the tragedy and derided by others. Frankly, his obligatory words as mourner-in-chief matter
little to me. School officials spoke, and they said about what we expected they
would. Pastors will be called on to conduct funerals, and they’ll summon as
best they can words of comfort. They’ll try to lend perspective and offer hope.
But the best words at this time come from you and me. People
need to get their words out there, and they need to do it now, while thoughts
and emotions are fresh. It is healthy. We’ve all been trained a little too well
to play nice, to not speak things that will bring upset to other people. The
price of that, though, is unprocessed grief that corrodes the soul. Even if
inelegantly stated, words are the vehicle that shed light in dark places. They
are our coping mechanism.
Does God have anything to say about an event like this? Yes, he does. But let's not forget that God's communication with the world tends to be more global than situation-specific. In the book of Job, he simply lets Job and his friends rail on and on until they run out of steam. And then God speaks. He's not obligated to take the podium within hours of a school shooting. His "reaction" is less a reaction than a reiteration of foundational truths about himself, humankind, sin, and the prospect of redemption. Ultimately, he expressed himself through the Incarnation - "The Word became flesh and lived among us" - and all who were confused about the nature of God needed to wonder no more. That grand articulation is the reason we have Christmas.
I know I said earlier that words need to flow freely at a time like this, but spiritual platitudes meant to "help" are probably the least effective words that can be spoken right now. Christians believe God is true, and if God is forever, then truth is forever too. I think that's one reason we feel compelled to find words, even when it seems there are none, because deep down we can't and won't accept that something so awful can exist for no reason at all.
Someday, long in the future, the parents of 20 kids who
died Friday will be able to say, “In 2012, something terrible happened to me and
to my child. I couldn’t make sense of it then, and I can’t make sense of it
now, but it’s part of my story. And I accept that.” When they can speak those
words and mean them, it will mark a great step toward healing.
"There are no words"? But there are. And we'll find them.
Thursday, November 29, 2012
The Half-Man becomes a Full-On Christian
Don’t watch Two and a
Half Men, the actor who plays the youngest character implored via video
this week, despite the fact that us watching the show has made him a
multi-millionaire – just not a household name. Ironically, Angus Jones may be one of those stars whose name was
hardly known until he was no longer a star. And we should stop watching because
Two and a Half Men is filth, and no
one who calls themselves a Christian can be on a show like that, and television
is a tool of Satan to distract people from God.
The long-term effects of Jones’ diatribe are unclear – Will he lose his job? Will people actually quit watching? – but the short-term effects are quite clear, and predictable. Jones is being lambasted as a hypocrite, people who’ve never paid attention to the show are intrigued, and every controversial statement Jones’ pastor has ever made on anything is being laid bare for the world to lampoon.
Why do Christians who gain a platform in the entertainment world (or in this case, someone who has a platform and becomes a Christian) do this? Answers range from “He really believes it” (in which case, why doesn’t he just quit the show?) to “He can’t hold back – let the chips fall where they may.” He’s not the only believer in the entertainment industry, and saying no gracefully to compromising or offensive material is a perennial issue for Christians in Hollywood. I can imagine it makes many of them sad to see this. After trying to establish Christians as people of character and conviction, Jones undercuts them in one interview, feeding the stereotype that Christians are maniacal and judgmental, holier-than-thou.
Now, it is true that Jones’ videotaped testimony was not meant for public consumption. So when he says, “Please stop watching it,” he’s appealing to a closed group – the Christians who are sitting through his hour long testimony. But really? Is he the only 19-year-old on the planet who’s unaware of how easily videos can be posted to the Internet? It’s pretty hard to believe – impossible, in fact – that he didn’t expect the whole world to see this.
Jones has (or at least, he had) a sphere of influence. In my estimation, he blew it. There will be some die-hards who defend what he said and think he did exactly the right thing in launching a full-scale frontal assault on his own show. They’ll call it courageous and say it’s about time Christians crusade against Hollywood.
Are they wrong? Well, tactically, yes. And that’s where your kid comes in. Your kids have a sphere of influence. They, too, are being asked to consume questionable or objectionable media material. Let’s estimate it happens, oh, daily. They pass it on (or not) via likes or shares on Facebook, by downloading and posting and pinning…when they talk about a video “going viral”, kids are often the engines of that, the “carriers” of the virus, facilitating the outbreak.
This is opportunity city. In fact, ask your kids, right now: If a friend were to send you a video that’s inappropriate, what would you do? (And I’m not talking about pornography; that one’s pretty clear-cut. I’m talking about scenes with innuendo, music videos or lyrics that are suggestive, dialogue that normalizes or jokes about marital unfaithfulness or premarital sex – in other words, the stuff people watch.) Then, ask them the more interesting questions: How would you know if something was inappropriate? and What makes some things appropriate or inappropriate? This could open up a fruitful dialogue about why, exactly, the things we see and hear affect the way we think and feel. (Really - go ahead and ask them; I’ll be waiting here when you get back.)
It’s rare to find a kid who would launch into a lecture of his friends about why a particular piece of media is inappropriate or “filthy” and why no one who calls themselves a good Christian would ever watch it or take part in it. And it turns out that instinct is correct! If Christians start speaking like aliens, people will soon regard us as – well – aliens. It’s the classic “in-the-world-but-not-of-it” dilemma. Are we called apart? Yes. Are we the salt of the earth and light of the world? Yes.
But what sometimes gets lost is that life is not about media choices. The substance of my life does not equate to the media choices I make. The significance of life is wrapped up in its design. Just as a table was meant to be a table, and its worth can be judged by its success or failure at that, human worth is entwined with the imago Dei, the image of God. And that means we always reflect the image of God – but each to a greater or lesser degree. Can you make someone care about that? I don’t know. But until they do, they won’t care much about the thoughts and ideas they take in. Or they will care, but it’ll be a misplaced concern because they think life is about scoring 100% on the naughty/nice exam rather than about growth and maturing and purpose and relationships and sanctification and knowing the heart and will of God.
So in a way, Angus got it right. But his execution was tone deaf. I didn’t know who he was before, and I’ve only watched Two and a Half Men a handful of times. I don’t need him to tell me that the content of the show is good, bad, or indifferent. He’s not a role model to me one way or the other. His rant only drew my attention to him: What was he thinking would come of this? We know that friendship influence – person-to-person, sustained, because-I-care-about-you – is what builds up and sticks when you’re trying to make positive change. But some future star saw what Jones modeled for them. And they too will abuse the platform they’ve been given, looking foolish and out of touch by going on the negative.
The long-term effects of Jones’ diatribe are unclear – Will he lose his job? Will people actually quit watching? – but the short-term effects are quite clear, and predictable. Jones is being lambasted as a hypocrite, people who’ve never paid attention to the show are intrigued, and every controversial statement Jones’ pastor has ever made on anything is being laid bare for the world to lampoon.
Angus, why?
Why do Christians who gain a platform in the entertainment world (or in this case, someone who has a platform and becomes a Christian) do this? Answers range from “He really believes it” (in which case, why doesn’t he just quit the show?) to “He can’t hold back – let the chips fall where they may.” He’s not the only believer in the entertainment industry, and saying no gracefully to compromising or offensive material is a perennial issue for Christians in Hollywood. I can imagine it makes many of them sad to see this. After trying to establish Christians as people of character and conviction, Jones undercuts them in one interview, feeding the stereotype that Christians are maniacal and judgmental, holier-than-thou.
Now, it is true that Jones’ videotaped testimony was not meant for public consumption. So when he says, “Please stop watching it,” he’s appealing to a closed group – the Christians who are sitting through his hour long testimony. But really? Is he the only 19-year-old on the planet who’s unaware of how easily videos can be posted to the Internet? It’s pretty hard to believe – impossible, in fact – that he didn’t expect the whole world to see this.
Jones has (or at least, he had) a sphere of influence. In my estimation, he blew it. There will be some die-hards who defend what he said and think he did exactly the right thing in launching a full-scale frontal assault on his own show. They’ll call it courageous and say it’s about time Christians crusade against Hollywood.
Are they wrong? Well, tactically, yes. And that’s where your kid comes in. Your kids have a sphere of influence. They, too, are being asked to consume questionable or objectionable media material. Let’s estimate it happens, oh, daily. They pass it on (or not) via likes or shares on Facebook, by downloading and posting and pinning…when they talk about a video “going viral”, kids are often the engines of that, the “carriers” of the virus, facilitating the outbreak.
This is opportunity city. In fact, ask your kids, right now: If a friend were to send you a video that’s inappropriate, what would you do? (And I’m not talking about pornography; that one’s pretty clear-cut. I’m talking about scenes with innuendo, music videos or lyrics that are suggestive, dialogue that normalizes or jokes about marital unfaithfulness or premarital sex – in other words, the stuff people watch.) Then, ask them the more interesting questions: How would you know if something was inappropriate? and What makes some things appropriate or inappropriate? This could open up a fruitful dialogue about why, exactly, the things we see and hear affect the way we think and feel. (Really - go ahead and ask them; I’ll be waiting here when you get back.)
It’s rare to find a kid who would launch into a lecture of his friends about why a particular piece of media is inappropriate or “filthy” and why no one who calls themselves a good Christian would ever watch it or take part in it. And it turns out that instinct is correct! If Christians start speaking like aliens, people will soon regard us as – well – aliens. It’s the classic “in-the-world-but-not-of-it” dilemma. Are we called apart? Yes. Are we the salt of the earth and light of the world? Yes.
But what sometimes gets lost is that life is not about media choices. The substance of my life does not equate to the media choices I make. The significance of life is wrapped up in its design. Just as a table was meant to be a table, and its worth can be judged by its success or failure at that, human worth is entwined with the imago Dei, the image of God. And that means we always reflect the image of God – but each to a greater or lesser degree. Can you make someone care about that? I don’t know. But until they do, they won’t care much about the thoughts and ideas they take in. Or they will care, but it’ll be a misplaced concern because they think life is about scoring 100% on the naughty/nice exam rather than about growth and maturing and purpose and relationships and sanctification and knowing the heart and will of God.
So in a way, Angus got it right. But his execution was tone deaf. I didn’t know who he was before, and I’ve only watched Two and a Half Men a handful of times. I don’t need him to tell me that the content of the show is good, bad, or indifferent. He’s not a role model to me one way or the other. His rant only drew my attention to him: What was he thinking would come of this? We know that friendship influence – person-to-person, sustained, because-I-care-about-you – is what builds up and sticks when you’re trying to make positive change. But some future star saw what Jones modeled for them. And they too will abuse the platform they’ve been given, looking foolish and out of touch by going on the negative.
Friday, November 9, 2012
This Kid’s Got Talent. HIS talent.
Ethan Bortnick is an amazingly talented piano player. At eleven years old, he has played a worldwide concert tour, been on Oprah, and starred in a movie that will be released next year (oh yeah - he wrote all the music for that, too). He holds the Guinness World Record for youngest solo musician to headline a tour, an achievement that - his website boasts - beats out Michael Jackson, Gladys Knight, and Stevie Wonder.
So why am I not excited for this kid?
I’m not excited because behind all of his charm and stupefying skill I’m pretty sure there’s a machine, and the machine is run by a monster called profit. I mean, it’s possible that all of this was his idea. It’s possible that after he started composing music at age 5, he began to dream of opportunities for worldwide exposure and the advancement of his career. It’s possible that he woke up one day and said, “You know what? I need a website. And a publicist. And Twitter.” That’s all possible. But I doubt it.
I’m not excited because behind all of his charm and stupefying skill I’m pretty sure there’s a machine, and the machine is run by a monster called profit. I mean, it’s possible that all of this was his idea. It’s possible that after he started composing music at age 5, he began to dream of opportunities for worldwide exposure and the advancement of his career. It’s possible that he woke up one day and said, “You know what? I need a website. And a publicist. And Twitter.” That’s all possible. But I doubt it.
What’s more likely is that there’s an army of adults behind
this seeing dollar signs. Which is not to denigrate his ability. He’s a phenom
– watch 30 seconds of him on YouTube and you’ll know that. He’s a phenom; but
must he be a superstar? That’s the
question that nags at me anytime I see an ultra-talented kid thrust into the
limelight.
It even occurs to me from time to time when I encounter a
moderately talented kid who locks onto a specialized interest at a young age. I
get the benefits. It gives them a goal to achieve, it teaches them
self-discipline and the value of practice, it “keeps them out of trouble” (as
if idle, unstructured time in a kid’s life necessarily equates with “trouble”).
It furnishes an identity and a ready friendship group to relate to. I get that.
But I wonder, what’s the cost?
In Ethan’s case, his publicity machine – ahem, team – seems
bent on convincing us that he’s “just a normal kid”, who “plays videogames
until they call his name and he runs on stage”, who loves his parents and school and his
friends, etc. etc. Yep, pretty normal – except for the part about appearing on
Good Morning America and recording albums and writing film scores and meeting
Elton John. Where is this headed? Lindsay Lohan was a pretty cute kid, too. So
was Gary Coleman. And the Brady Bunch
kids, many of whom battled drugs and alcohol and depression through their adult
years. Show business is notoriously hard on child stars. (Macauley Culkin,
anyone? Miley Cyrus? Cory Haim? The list goes on.) Which could be why Bortnick’s public persona stresses his
“everyday kid” side (apart from the Guinness World Record thing, of course). I
have a feeling the adults behind him want to assure us that he’s above
corruption. No doubt they want to believe it themselves, as anyone whose train
is hitched to this star stands to make out big.
I’m not predicting that early stardom will hinder his growth
into healthy adulthood, and I’m not wishing for that. But is that even the
point? Isn’t the bigger issue this matter of him achieving super-stardom on
levels that are absolutely inaccessible to 11-year-olds? I mean, the kid’s got
talent. And he can play Vegas and with Beyonce and on Oprah…but should he? When does kid-sized exuberance
cross over into adult-sized ambition, reaching the point where it’s ripe for
exploitation and no longer about him?
Because the kid’s got talent; but it’s his talent. And with that comes the right to say no, something
that’s very hard to do when sponsors and venues and promoters and fans are
depending on you for output. Even if Team Bortnick is somehow able to keep him
above the pressure and away from the business end of things, the fact remains
that him producing and continuing to produce is the key to the whole
enterprise. And that’s a little scary.
Just yesterday on ESPN, Sportscenter
was showing clips of a nine-year-old girl who is dominating her (mostly
all-boy) tackle football league in Utah. But...why? What is it in us that holds
almost morbid fascination for extraordinary ability in kids? If this is an
instinct (because “dog bites man” isn’t news, but “man bites dog” is), fine.
But why must we publicize it? Because
before we know it, USC will be recruiting her and we’ll all be locked into a
decade-long reality TV-fest of “Sam’s Road to the Heisman”. Unbelievable.
Individual agency – the ability to exercise self-direction
and be acknowledged as an autonomous being – presupposes choices. If kids
aren’t able to say no, either because they aren’t given permission to, or
because no is actually impossible, then we as adults aren't respecting them and we aren't taking them seriously. They’re not living lives so much as they are living
out scripts dictated to them by grownups.
What if Ethan said no? Unlikely as it is, what if tomorrow
he decided all the concerts, all the fundraising, all the recording were over,
and he was done? Could he just go outside and play? No doubt some people would
answer, “But kids need to be taught to keep commitments – that’s part of being
a responsible grown up.” Yes, they need to keep their commitments – the ones they
make and choose. Force your kid to play out the football season? You bet –
assuming they knew what they were getting into at the start and freely chose
it. Make them persevere through music lessons or other challenging skill-based
activities? Up to a certain level of proficiency, sure.
But kids need exposure to lots of different activities. They need to try lots of things, some
of which they’ll excel at and others of which they won’t. And since time is
limited, that means they need to have the freedom to stop doing some things in
order to take up other things. Because it’s not likely that, like Ethan
Bortnick, they’ll sit down at the piano at age 3 and play Mozart by ear,
launching them on a fast track to fame. Come to think of it, thank God for
that.
Friday, November 2, 2012
It's Time to Talk
We must be the most over-communicated-to people in history. Remember the early days of the Internet, when "I've got e-mail" was spoken with awe? Now it's usually accompanied by a groan. Nearly every day, I'm checking three e-mail accounts, two voicemail accounts, and a text-to-email thing from Google - plus Facebook. I sometimes value vacations just because it means I'll have less information coming at me.
With no shortage of information, who decides what gets our attention? We do...sort of. But are we as in control as we think we are? I ask this today (Friday) as I've been evicted from my office because we're getting new carpeting. The phones are unplugged and I'm working in the hallway - and yet every time I hear another phone ring, my instinct is to drop what I'm doing and answer it.
In other words, there is a conditioning process that determines what gets our attention, so that over and above all the noise coming at us, there are some messages that have a way of getting noticed. That's why you can rest assured that when it comes to kids and the Internet, two types of messages are getting through: messages about friends (i.e., social networking) and messages about sex (because as the old advertising saying goes, "sex sells").
The best defense against this - sometimes the only defense - is a good offense. It's called a "filter". Filters can be external or internal. When it comes to kids and the Internet, we need to develop both. Filters work by recognizing threats and mounting defenses against them. When it comes to your standard Internet browser filter, that process is relatively automatic: certain words trigger the defense, and the block goes into place ("This page is unavailable"). The goal in developing your kid's internal filter is this: first to develop that as a conscious process, and then, for the conscious process to become unconscious.
In order for it to happen consciously, kids need to know there is a danger, and recognize the danger, and know why it's a danger. And then they need the skill of redirection - do I turn it off? Ignore it? Click away? Tell someone?
For instance, when a kid encounters a threatening or bullying message on Facebook, they have a choice: do I respond? And if so, how? When they receive an e-mail from a stranger, do they delete it? Report it? Do they label it as spam? Do they even know how to do that? What if they receive a strange link, in an e-mail with an intriguing or suggestive subject line? What's the right thing to do?
Can kids really do this? The answer is, they'd better! Because automated Internet filters will always be imperfect. They'll either shut out legitimate content, or they'll miss things they should catch. The only sure-fire method for blocking harmful Internet content is to not be on the Internet at all. And I don't know many families who are willing to go there! And would that even solve the problem? The Internet is in schools, in libraries...and on their friends' handheld devices.
So while I endorse the use of filtering software and technological restrictions by parents, I cannot recommend that your precautions end there. The "second line" needs to be developed, and that's the defense that resides inside of them. Think it's as simple as knowing "good" from "bad"? For a young child, that's probably enough. But as a kid's understanding of the world grows in sophistication, their understanding of how to fight needs to keep pace. Those elements, again, are knowing there is a danger, recognizing the danger, and knowing why a particular thing is a danger.
Danger to what? Danger to our ability to grow toward God-ordained maturity; danger to our ability to grow into real people. Real people understand who they are, who God is, the difference is between us and God, and consequently, our need for him. A warped view of sexuality, an unhealthy dependence on technology, and the inability to navigate problems in relationships all threaten our journey toward becoming real, healthy people. And all of these things can come from misuse of the Internet.
So, it's time to talk. We have some experts coming in to talk to you, so that you can in turn talk to your kids. "The Online Sexual Minefield: Keeping Your Kids Safe" is up first, next Wednesday night (Nov. 7) at 7 pm. Cory Anderson and Treina Nash, both licensed marriage and family therapists, bring back their helpful and informative presentation on your kids, sex, and the Internet. It's totally free of charge, we'll care for you 4th-6th grade kids (junior high and high school groups meet on-campus that night), and you'll walk away with a ton of information.
The second event will be the first Wednesday in December. On the 5th, we're hosting a training event on how to use "Passport to Purity," which is a kit put out by Family Life. The CDs and journals are meant to help parents construct a fun, meaningful weekend with their preteen and initiate all kinds of conversations about growing up. And it works! The night will be led by moms and dads who've used the material, who can guide you and encourage you on carrying on the program with your son or daughter. Pre-ordering the kits is optional, you can do that here. But, you are also welcome to just come to the night to see what it's all about, free of charge.
I'm glad for technology (obviously; I blog). But it's created a need for all of us to become just a little smarter than the tools we use. We want to make you aware, so you can help your kids be aware. And remember that constructing the filter is a process - it's not one conversation but many. The events November 7 and December 5 are meant to start you in the right direction.
With no shortage of information, who decides what gets our attention? We do...sort of. But are we as in control as we think we are? I ask this today (Friday) as I've been evicted from my office because we're getting new carpeting. The phones are unplugged and I'm working in the hallway - and yet every time I hear another phone ring, my instinct is to drop what I'm doing and answer it.
In other words, there is a conditioning process that determines what gets our attention, so that over and above all the noise coming at us, there are some messages that have a way of getting noticed. That's why you can rest assured that when it comes to kids and the Internet, two types of messages are getting through: messages about friends (i.e., social networking) and messages about sex (because as the old advertising saying goes, "sex sells").
The best defense against this - sometimes the only defense - is a good offense. It's called a "filter". Filters can be external or internal. When it comes to kids and the Internet, we need to develop both. Filters work by recognizing threats and mounting defenses against them. When it comes to your standard Internet browser filter, that process is relatively automatic: certain words trigger the defense, and the block goes into place ("This page is unavailable"). The goal in developing your kid's internal filter is this: first to develop that as a conscious process, and then, for the conscious process to become unconscious.
In order for it to happen consciously, kids need to know there is a danger, and recognize the danger, and know why it's a danger. And then they need the skill of redirection - do I turn it off? Ignore it? Click away? Tell someone?
For instance, when a kid encounters a threatening or bullying message on Facebook, they have a choice: do I respond? And if so, how? When they receive an e-mail from a stranger, do they delete it? Report it? Do they label it as spam? Do they even know how to do that? What if they receive a strange link, in an e-mail with an intriguing or suggestive subject line? What's the right thing to do?
Can kids really do this? The answer is, they'd better! Because automated Internet filters will always be imperfect. They'll either shut out legitimate content, or they'll miss things they should catch. The only sure-fire method for blocking harmful Internet content is to not be on the Internet at all. And I don't know many families who are willing to go there! And would that even solve the problem? The Internet is in schools, in libraries...and on their friends' handheld devices.
So while I endorse the use of filtering software and technological restrictions by parents, I cannot recommend that your precautions end there. The "second line" needs to be developed, and that's the defense that resides inside of them. Think it's as simple as knowing "good" from "bad"? For a young child, that's probably enough. But as a kid's understanding of the world grows in sophistication, their understanding of how to fight needs to keep pace. Those elements, again, are knowing there is a danger, recognizing the danger, and knowing why a particular thing is a danger.
Danger to what? Danger to our ability to grow toward God-ordained maturity; danger to our ability to grow into real people. Real people understand who they are, who God is, the difference is between us and God, and consequently, our need for him. A warped view of sexuality, an unhealthy dependence on technology, and the inability to navigate problems in relationships all threaten our journey toward becoming real, healthy people. And all of these things can come from misuse of the Internet.
So, it's time to talk. We have some experts coming in to talk to you, so that you can in turn talk to your kids. "The Online Sexual Minefield: Keeping Your Kids Safe" is up first, next Wednesday night (Nov. 7) at 7 pm. Cory Anderson and Treina Nash, both licensed marriage and family therapists, bring back their helpful and informative presentation on your kids, sex, and the Internet. It's totally free of charge, we'll care for you 4th-6th grade kids (junior high and high school groups meet on-campus that night), and you'll walk away with a ton of information.
The second event will be the first Wednesday in December. On the 5th, we're hosting a training event on how to use "Passport to Purity," which is a kit put out by Family Life. The CDs and journals are meant to help parents construct a fun, meaningful weekend with their preteen and initiate all kinds of conversations about growing up. And it works! The night will be led by moms and dads who've used the material, who can guide you and encourage you on carrying on the program with your son or daughter. Pre-ordering the kits is optional, you can do that here. But, you are also welcome to just come to the night to see what it's all about, free of charge.
I'm glad for technology (obviously; I blog). But it's created a need for all of us to become just a little smarter than the tools we use. We want to make you aware, so you can help your kids be aware. And remember that constructing the filter is a process - it's not one conversation but many. The events November 7 and December 5 are meant to start you in the right direction.
Monday, October 15, 2012
Spiritual Growth Marker #3: Allegiance
We’ve probably all been a situation where we reach the point
where our heart’s not in it. Regardless of our technical skill or experience,
the excitement isn’t there. It happens among talented young athletes and among
seasoned professionals, and no amount of coaxing can re-light the fire.
This intangible is called allegiance, and while it’s
probably the best direct measure of spiritual growth, it’s also the hardest to
measure precisely, and the hardest to stimulate.
The Bible makes clear that our connection with God is not
based on begrudging servitude, but on allegiance. It’s a heart issue:
“You shall have no
other Gods before me.” – Exodus 20:3
“Love the LORD your
God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your strength.”
– Deuteronomy 6:5
“The Lord your God
will circumcise your hearts and the hearts of your descendants, so that you may
love him with all your heart and with all your soul, and live.” –
Deuteronomy 30:6
“The Lord says: “These
people come near to me with their mouth and honor me with their lips, but their
hearts are far from me. Their worship of me is based on merely human rules they
have been taught.” – Isaiah 29:13
“Even now,” declares the Lord, “return to me with all your heart, with
fasting and weeping and mourning.” Rend your heart and not your garments. - Joel 2:12-13
“The mouth speaks what
the heart is full of.” – Matthew 12:34
“You will seek me and find me when you seek me with all your heart.”
– Jeremiah 29:13
God demands loyalty. What’s striking is how many times the
command to love God “with all your heart” appears in Deuteronomy, which is a
book of the Law! The Law of Moses outlined the Israelites’ duties to God, yet
at its core, the Law was meant to produce inward – not outward –
transformation.
How do you make this happen? It can be hard enough to
maintain our own spiritual enthusiasm. How would we stimulate that in kids? First,
the difficulty of this task should prompt us to go slowly and with the
appreciation that ultimately, you can’t.
You cannot directly steer someone’s heart, any more than you can get someone to
fall in love with you or force someone to love baseball. All you can do is try
to win them.
So it begins with this: do we believe God is winsome? Do we
believe God is actively in pursuit of all people? Is our conception of
“following God” basically moralism, where we walk the straight-and-narrow
because that’s what God wants? Or is it an adventure, keeping up with the God
who’s active?
Kids will never fall
in love with rules. Neither will adults. “Goodness is its own reward”?
Sometimes. But the overwhelming message of life is that life’s not fair;
therefore, grab every advantage you can, because you don’t want to end up with
the short end of the stick. The Christian life is not “living according to biblical
principles.” That reduces Christianity to just one more ethical system in which
we’ve been given the rules and we strive our best to live them out, and when we
fail, we try harder. I doubt anyone who lives that way can develop much
allegiance to God, because that’s a relationship fueled by guilt and
obligation.
No, the only God people can develop a deep allegiance for is
the God of yesterday, today and
forever. We need to appreciate what he’s done in history, yes, because it is
the roadmap of his character. We need to look forward to his return. But we
need to follow the God of now.
That’s why teaching kids Bible stories isn’t enough. It
familiarizes them with the God of then,
but doesn’t necessarily build loyalty for the God of now. I can admire Martin Luther King or Abraham Lincoln, but day in
and day out, would I be loyal to
them? Am I thinking about what they would have me do and who they would have me
be? The closest I can come is allegiance to the ideals of those historical figures – but ideals are static.
“What did Jesus
do?” is only useful insofar as it helps me answer the question, “What would Jesus do?” Still better is, “What
is Jesus doing?” We need to talk about what God is up to, because apart from an
acknowledgement or awareness of that, God just becomes a character in a
storybook. I find that more often than not, Christian kids lack the language to
do that. They know generally that God wants them to “be good”, but beyond that
have a hard time identifying specifically putting their finger on how God is
working or might work in their lives. We can overdo God-talk in a way that
turns kids off, and it’s wrong to speak of God’s activity as if our comfort and
convenience were his reason for being.
The key is to teach kids to recognize what in accordance with his character as revealed
in Scripture God is still doing, today, in them. That’s something they can
get excited about, as they see their own lives in a line with all of humanity
as characters in a salvation story. God is doing different things in everyone,
but ultimately he’s doing the same thing: accomplishing the reconciliation of
the whole world to himself.
The Christian life is lived in union with Christ. There is a
supernatural element to it. By definition, a spiritual life cannot be lived in
the flesh or just by our own willpower. If what we’re teaching is a code of
ethics that could be followed by anyone – Christian or non-Christian – then by
what right do we call it Christianity? Allegiance
will develop when kids are convinced that God is not far off, but is right
there with them – guiding them, strengthening them, providing for them,
correcting and shaping them. Leading kids to know this sort of God is hard
work. But ultimately, it’s the only kind of God I can have allegiance to.
Friday, October 5, 2012
Spiritual Growth Marker #2: Network
If we in Surge host an event for 4th, 5th and 6th graders, the 4th and 5th graders will want to know, "What are we going to do there?" If it sounds fun, they'll come. But 6th graders will ask, "Who else is going to be there?"
That difference points to the importance of network. Last week I wrote about identity as one marker of spiritual growth. As kids grow in their
appreciation of what it means for someone to identify as a Christian, it’s both
a sign that they are growing spiritually and a good indication that their
growth will continue. Likewise, the development of a network of friends at church indicates both growth and the
likelihood of future growth.
In a way, network is an extension of the concept of
identity, and that’s why its importance is really hard to overstate. We tend to
associate ourselves not only with those who are like-minded, but with those who
match the profile of how we perceive ourselves. We will become like those we
hang out with.
When kids are young, their primary influences are Mom and
Dad. Lots of time is readily spent among family members, and that’s why we tend
almost unthinkingly to absorb the values and worldview of our parents. But as
kids grow up, the peer group takes the place of the nuclear family in shaping identity.
Are there exceptions? Are there families where time spent among friends doesn’t
come to monopolize an older teenager’s life? Yes – but they are rare.
(A strong qualification is in order here. It’s often
asserted that when it comes to influencing decisions, peers take the place of parents during the
teenage years. Don’t buy it. Support for that is shaky. Years ago, Search
Institute found that teenagers said they were still more likely to turn to
parents for advice on serious issues, or if they were in trouble, or if they
needed to make a big decision, than they were likely to turn to peers. Maybe
the best that can be said is that teenagers tend to consciously turn to friends for guidance, and on matters that
affect their day-to-day conduct but that are relatively minor in the vast
scheme of things. Parental influence, having been in place since birth,
continues to unconsciously shape us, and is considered more valuable when it
comes to the big issues of life. That’s provided, of course, that parents haven’t
entirely retreated and remain available and willing to be consulted. As kids
grow up, they still need their parents; they
just need them in a different way.)
Does this mean, then, that kids should only have Christian friends? Emphatically, no. Christians are
supposed to be salt and light to the world, and kids absolutely can be this influence to their friends. Raising kids
entirely away from the influence of the world is nearly impossible, and even if
it were possible, it wouldn’t be a great idea, because a world that’s entirely
sanitized is a world that perceives no need for Jesus. The kids I’ve known who
have the most zeal for impacting their friends are neither those who’ve been
ruthlessly sheltered nor those who’ve been surrendered entirely to worldly
influences. Instead, these world-changers are wise, having both an appreciation of the depths of the world’s need
for God and the optimism that God is more than able to solve the world’s
problems.
So here is the generalization – and admittedly, it’s a
generalization: As teenagers, your kids
will likely adopt the values and outlook of those they spend the most time
with.
There are many candidates for that role, and each resides in
separate circles I call networks. We all have networks of affiliations across
the many spheres of our lives. You have a work network, a family network, and a
neighborhood network. Your kids have a school network (or, if they’re in a
middle school that switches classes, a separate network in each class), sports
team networks, after-school friend networks, club networks, etc. Sometimes, we
ourselves are the only common denominator among our various networks. Imagine
you threw a party, inviting everyone you knew, and everyone showed up. Some of
us would have lots of overlap, so that the people we work with and play with,
for instance, would already know each other and have plenty to talk about. But
I suspect for most of us, that would be a very busy party, as we worked to make
introductions among the disparate spheres who knew nothing about each other.
The hope, for your kid’s sake, would be 1) that they develop
a network of church friends, and 2) that those friends would become some of
their closest friends. How do we make this happen? Time! Not just time spent at
services and events, but time spent together. I am convinced that one of the
best intangibles that can come out of
a kid’s involvement in a preteen ministry is the development of a
supportive friend network. We make a mistake if we think this “just happens.”
It doesn’t, any more than you’ve become friends with the person who sits four rows ahead of you, whose face you recognize but whom you don't know. Friendships develop
intentionally, and sometimes at this age kids don’t yet have the social skills
to make friendship sticky. To them, a friend is someone who likes to do the same stuff
as you; friendships built around taking a mutual interest in one another requires
more maturity.
So we must make big church small, and we must teach and
encourage kids to develop
friendships. On the whole, I think a large church is a great advantage, because
the chance that everyone can find their niche is better. But the danger does
exist that we’ll remain a bunch of islands (our 4th-6th
grade ministry is made up of kids from about 75 different public, private and
home schools). Ask your son or daughter: who do they know? Who are they getting
to know? And model this yourself – how strong is your own network within the
church?
Even if kids have just one
good friend at church, that can make all the difference as they age into
junior high and high school ministry. Ideally, we all as Christians would have a core
of close friends to lean on when we’re going through the tough stuff. That
adolescence involves more than its share of tough stuff – at least in the
perception of those going through it – is all the more reason that building and
strengthening that network is vital when kids are preteens.
Saturday, September 29, 2012
Spiritual Growth Marker #1: Identity
How do we measure spiritual growth? (I addressed the question of whether we should last week, and some thoughts on nurturing spiritual growth two weeks ago.) What are the outward signs of an inward change? More importantly, what are the signs that the fertile ground is in place for continued future growth?
One of these markers is identity. What does it mean to be a Christian? And what does it mean when someone calls themselves a Christian? We asked the kids to write answers to those questions last weekend. Here's a sampling of what they said:
This was not a scientific sampling, so let me report these results by category and in terms of tendencies. Overall, kids gave answers that were largely doctrinally correct. Some of them defined "Christian" in terms of belief. For example:
Someone who believes in God.
Someone who believes that God is real and the savior. When someone calls themself a Christian it means they believe the Jesus loves them and died for them.
If you are a Christian you believe God is a real person.
It means that you believe in God and Jesus.
Somebody who believes Jesus is the son of God and he died on the cross for our sins.
It means that they believe in God, and that they won't worship the devil. A Christian person means that they worship only God.
Someone who BELIEVES that he (Jesus) is the only and only God and that God died on the cross for our sins.
A believer in the great Lord.
It means that they believe in God with all their heart but if they don't they lied.
Others defined "a Christian" in terms of religious practice:
It means that they asked God to their heart.
A Christian is someone who goes to church.
They're open to God. Talks to God when having problems. Goes to church. Prays.
Somebody who believes God exists and follows God's directions. Go to church and reads the Bible and prays.
Someone who loves and praises God.
A Christian is someone God invited to church.
Still others described "Christian" behaviorally:
A Christian is a person who walks with Christ.
It means they're living by God's word.
To live for God; give your life to God, follow his word with a joyful heart.
A Christian is someone who cares about everybody and follows the word of the Bible and is a born again Christian. If someone calls themselves "Christian" it means that they're caring and giving.
It means they have devoted their lives to God.
It means that you've committed to love God? I think?
If someone calls themselves a Christian it means they are loyal to God's word.
One who follows God and does as he would have you do.
Some combined belief & action:
It means that they believe in God and they are a follower.
Someone who serves God and knows about him and prays to him every day.
If a person says that they are a Christian it means that they have faith in God and study the Bible.
A Christian is someone who believes in God and tries to follow the Lord and do the best he can not to sin. (If someone calls themselves a Christian it means) that they believe and try to follow the Ten Commandments.
Someone who calls themself a Christian means they believe in God and read the Bible and tries to forgive and do what's right.
It means that you go to church and believe in Jesus. And read the Bible.
Someone who believes Jesus died on the cross to save us from sin. And loves others undiscriminately. And is slow to anger.
A Christian is somebody who gives all they have for God and believes that Jesus died for their sin.
A Christian is a believer in God who celebrates Jesus' death on the cross.
A Christian means to pray every day and listen to Christian music, and even to listen to God. It means that they are followers of Christ and they invited Jesus into their hearts.
To believe in God is to trust him in thick and thin. It's someone who cares about each other and they will only worship God.
That means they go to church and care about each other.
Someone who devotes their life to Christ and serves him. They believe that he died on the cross and believe in the Bible.
God is their savior. They believe Jesus died on the cross. Their sins have been forgiven. They try to follow his ways.
A few astutely noted that:
When someone calls themself a Christian they might not be.
I know a friend who does not act like Christian, and says that she is a Christian.
When people call themselves Christians, they may go to church, but they haven't accepted God.
(See also, “Can KidsOutgrow God?” from August 2011.)
One of these markers is identity. What does it mean to be a Christian? And what does it mean when someone calls themselves a Christian? We asked the kids to write answers to those questions last weekend. Here's a sampling of what they said:
This was not a scientific sampling, so let me report these results by category and in terms of tendencies. Overall, kids gave answers that were largely doctrinally correct. Some of them defined "Christian" in terms of belief. For example:
Someone who believes in God.
Someone who believes that God is real and the savior. When someone calls themself a Christian it means they believe the Jesus loves them and died for them.
If you are a Christian you believe God is a real person.
It means that you believe in God and Jesus.
Somebody who believes Jesus is the son of God and he died on the cross for our sins.
It means that they believe in God, and that they won't worship the devil. A Christian person means that they worship only God.
Someone who BELIEVES that he (Jesus) is the only and only God and that God died on the cross for our sins.
A believer in the great Lord.
It means that they believe in God with all their heart but if they don't they lied.
Others defined "a Christian" in terms of religious practice:
It means that they asked God to their heart.
A Christian is someone who goes to church.
They're open to God. Talks to God when having problems. Goes to church. Prays.
Somebody who believes God exists and follows God's directions. Go to church and reads the Bible and prays.
Someone who loves and praises God.
A Christian is someone God invited to church.
Still others described "Christian" behaviorally:
A Christian is a person who walks with Christ.
It means they're living by God's word.
To live for God; give your life to God, follow his word with a joyful heart.
A Christian is someone who cares about everybody and follows the word of the Bible and is a born again Christian. If someone calls themselves "Christian" it means that they're caring and giving.
It means they have devoted their lives to God.
It means that you've committed to love God? I think?
If someone calls themselves a Christian it means they are loyal to God's word.
One who follows God and does as he would have you do.
Some combined belief & action:
It means that they believe in God and they are a follower.
Someone who serves God and knows about him and prays to him every day.
If a person says that they are a Christian it means that they have faith in God and study the Bible.
A Christian is someone who believes in God and tries to follow the Lord and do the best he can not to sin. (If someone calls themselves a Christian it means) that they believe and try to follow the Ten Commandments.
Someone who calls themself a Christian means they believe in God and read the Bible and tries to forgive and do what's right.
It means that you go to church and believe in Jesus. And read the Bible.
Someone who believes Jesus died on the cross to save us from sin. And loves others undiscriminately. And is slow to anger.
A Christian is somebody who gives all they have for God and believes that Jesus died for their sin.
A Christian is a believer in God who celebrates Jesus' death on the cross.
A Christian means to pray every day and listen to Christian music, and even to listen to God. It means that they are followers of Christ and they invited Jesus into their hearts.
To believe in God is to trust him in thick and thin. It's someone who cares about each other and they will only worship God.
That means they go to church and care about each other.
Someone who devotes their life to Christ and serves him. They believe that he died on the cross and believe in the Bible.
God is their savior. They believe Jesus died on the cross. Their sins have been forgiven. They try to follow his ways.
A few astutely noted that:
When someone calls themself a Christian they might not be.
I know a friend who does not act like Christian, and says that she is a Christian.
When people call themselves Christians, they may go to church, but they haven't accepted God.
As
you can see, the questions drew a range of responses, but there are some common
themes. Words like "believe" and "follow" showed up
frequently. There are also numerous references to loving, caring, and serving.
What’s
missing, though, is a sense of the supernatural. Kids mentioned a lot of doing,
but that in itself reflects an important belief about ourselves – that we are
able, by force of will, to follow Christ; God said it + we do it = Christian.
This isn’t surprising, as kids are conditioned to follow the instructions of
authority figures. Inherent in adult directives to kids is the belief that the
kid can actually do what is being asked. Only a sadistic grown up would demand
something kids were actually unable to do.
A
sense that we “do things” to follow God (even if the do is to simply “believe”)
makes God rather pedestrian. Which is not to suggest that the Christian life
ought to be passive, but it must bear the marks of a living, breathing
relationship. “Relationship” isn’t a word we’d expect kids this age to use, but
look at the list of responses above: how many of them reflect a oneness,
me-and-Jesus dynamic?
This
is all key to the identity of a Christian. As kids get older, they’ll interface
with lots of people who believe in God in different ways, who pray, who love
others, who are moral, and who try to do right. What will it mean for them to
consider themselves a Christian when they’re 13? When they’re 15? When they’re
18? And what does it mean now, as a nine, ten, or eleven-year-old? It’s one
thing to say, “I believe in God,” but it’s another to ground your identity in
that – and to keep it grounded there.
Fuller
Seminary professor Chap Clark says adolescents try on a number of identities
during middle school and high school. He calls them “multiple candles of
identity” and says kids commonly hold many at the same time. Adults are more
predictable. Society has a set of expectations for husbands
and wives, for mothers and fathers, for young adults vs. retirees, and so
blending in (by assuming that culturally-constructed identity) is pretty easy.
It’s not easy for adolescents, because they’re not one thing, but many. And of
course our hope is that the anchor of all the identities they sample is that of
being a Christian.
How
does this happen? How do people – specifically early and middle adolescents –
come to adopt a Christian identity that goes beyond merely doing things –
showing up at church, praying, believing in God – and touches every part of
their life? (Or, from God’s perspective: what is happening when a person stops
compartmentalizing life and allows God to infuse every aspect?)
First,
kids need to see Christianity in action. And by that I actually don’t mean going on missions trips,
watching adults serve at soup kitchens, or learning how to sit through adult church.
I mean they need to witness actual Christians living real, everyday lives. Only
then will they get exposed to what happens when a Christian man or woman
suffers disappointment, gets frustrated, loses a job, has a health crisis,
deals with difficult people, or makes big decisions. And conversely, they will witness
the “good news” stuff of life too: how does a mature Christian celebrate
successes, and discover and use their gifts, and steward their money, and
socialize, and enjoy life? Of course, this will first come from what they see
in their parents, but who else can kids look to for this important shaping?
About
a year ago, I found myself experiencing a paradigm shift when it comes to
mentoring and discipleship. Usually we only realize gradually that our minds
have changed, but I was in the moment when I realized, “Hey – what I’m seeing
right now is something I’ve never thought of before.” A group of us – myself, a
4th-6th grade volunteer, three high school seniors, and
one high school freshman – were out to lunch, when it dawned on me that this
was a viable and hugely influential discipleship model. The freshman was
observing (and absorbing) the behavior patterns of people who already were what
he himself was becoming. He was getting a glimpse of his future self! Normally
we reverse it – one older leader is put in charge of many younger charges to
lead and mold. But here, the teachers were the many, and the student was the
one. And there was nothing formal going on, just life. Do you think he was
shaped by what he was immersed in that day? I sure think so.
We
humans are creatures of habit and imitation. That’s one reason children’s and
youth ministry is so rewarding: kids are eager for people who care enough to
show them the way: the way to act, the way to talk, the way to conduct
themselves – the way to be. And so
modeling takes on huge importance when it comes to kids adopting and owning the
identity of a Christian.
That’s
why kids must know a variety of older
Christians, because as they begin to “try on” identities as young teenagers –
“Am I like this? Or am I like that? Do I like this, or that?” – we want them to
have a frame of reference for what “a Christian” is and does. It’s not just
someone who believes in God, or goes to church, or does good. It’s closer to
the answers above that cited “following God” or “being devoted to God” – but what does that mean, outside of a church
context? That’s the crucial question for kids in forging an identity that is
grounded in Christ.
Knowledge
and understanding are first steps; actually caring enough to live it out is the
second step. Every youth pastor can tell you stories of kids who were unchurched
or on the fringes of a youth group, and as soon as an adult volunteer began
investing in them, modeling what it is to be a Christian, they came alive.
Others have seen poor modeling, and rejected it. And others sit on the fence.
I’ll write about nurturing allegiance – the third marker – in two weeks.
In
short, then, identity – owning the fact that “I am a Christian” and being able
to distinguish what that means – is a huge marker that something spiritual is
going on. And defining Christianity in terms of identity is a different thing
for a 14-year-old than it is for a ten-year-old. Which means this is a question
that must be continually faced and an understanding that must be continually
honed as kids grow up.
Thursday, September 27, 2012
The Rx: Awareness & Precaution. Prescription Drug Take-Back Day is this Saturday
The purpose of this blog has always been to communicate in longer form about issues related to preteens and family life. So is prescription drug abuse really one of those issues?
Yes. Sort of.
While I don't expect that any fourth, fifth, or sixth graders are currently using or being offered someone else's prescription drugs, if current trends hold, one in six will sometime during high school.
We think differently about prescription drugs - kids and adults do - because if they're legally prescribed they must be safer, right? Many of these substances are no less dangerous just because they're "legal", and it is in fact their legality that causes people to ingest them in lethal amounts (because, again, if it's a legal substance it must be safe). More Americans now die each year from drug overdoses than in car crashes; experts say prescription abuse accounts for the surge. Also, there's less of a stigma attached to taking someone else's prescription pills than using illegal drugs - even though using any pill prescribed to someone else is itself against the law.
But our biggest misconception is probably the profile of the average prescription drug abuser. A generation ago, there was a certain stereotype that attached to being a "druggie" - troubled, rebellious, a slacker (think Jeff Spicoli from Fast Times at Ridgemont High or John Bender from The Breakfast Club) - that more or less held true. It may have been movies and our own naivete that reinforced that stereotype. Now the world has become wiser - at least when it comes to illicit drugs - because we know that all types of kids, unfortunately, abuse drugs. But we have yet to come to that realization when it comes to the abuse of prescription drugs. The problem is too new; memorable taglines from the 1980s like "This is your brain on drugs" haven't yet taken hold.
Some of these are kids you really wouldn't expect. Straight-A and Advanced Placement course students will buy, crush and snort the ADD medication Adderall in order to stay alert during tests following all-night study sessions. Why would some of these "good kids" do that? Because they are desperate to do well on the high-stakes tests that determine their college futures.
Here's a sign that we don't yet "get it" when it comes to the scope of the problem: 6% of parents surveyed said they had a teenager who had abused prescription drugs, while 10% of teens say they have. The awareness will come - but in the meantime, what needs to be done is to make prescription drugs very, very difficult for kids to access. Namely, the prescription drugs in your own home. Locked cabinets are the ticket for the medicine you currently take. But disposal is the Rx for drugs you no longer take. Who among us doesn't have leftover prescription medication just sitting in the medicine cabinet, waiting for...what, exactly? And those are the pills we're least likely to notice if they go missing.
This Saturday, the DEA is holding nationwide "Take-Back" events where you can drop off leftover prescription drugs. (And no, you should not necessarily just flush them down the toilet.) Let me urge you to get in the habit of getting rid of prescription medicine in this way. The most commonly abused are painkillers, sedatives like Xanax, and stimulants like Ritalin, Adderall, and other ADD medications (because they're so plentiful). And, most importantly, think twice about the message you send if you give your kid prescription drugs that were meant for someone else (like another member of the family) - 22% of teens said their parents have done that.
In Carlsbad, the drop-off site is Scripps Coastal Medical Center at 2176 Salk Avenue; in Oceanside, at Tri-City Medical Center, 4002 Vista Way; and in Encinitas, at Scripps Hospital, 354 Santa Fe Drive. For other locations, click here.
Yes. Sort of.
While I don't expect that any fourth, fifth, or sixth graders are currently using or being offered someone else's prescription drugs, if current trends hold, one in six will sometime during high school.
We think differently about prescription drugs - kids and adults do - because if they're legally prescribed they must be safer, right? Many of these substances are no less dangerous just because they're "legal", and it is in fact their legality that causes people to ingest them in lethal amounts (because, again, if it's a legal substance it must be safe). More Americans now die each year from drug overdoses than in car crashes; experts say prescription abuse accounts for the surge. Also, there's less of a stigma attached to taking someone else's prescription pills than using illegal drugs - even though using any pill prescribed to someone else is itself against the law.
But our biggest misconception is probably the profile of the average prescription drug abuser. A generation ago, there was a certain stereotype that attached to being a "druggie" - troubled, rebellious, a slacker (think Jeff Spicoli from Fast Times at Ridgemont High or John Bender from The Breakfast Club) - that more or less held true. It may have been movies and our own naivete that reinforced that stereotype. Now the world has become wiser - at least when it comes to illicit drugs - because we know that all types of kids, unfortunately, abuse drugs. But we have yet to come to that realization when it comes to the abuse of prescription drugs. The problem is too new; memorable taglines from the 1980s like "This is your brain on drugs" haven't yet taken hold.
Some of these are kids you really wouldn't expect. Straight-A and Advanced Placement course students will buy, crush and snort the ADD medication Adderall in order to stay alert during tests following all-night study sessions. Why would some of these "good kids" do that? Because they are desperate to do well on the high-stakes tests that determine their college futures.
Here's a sign that we don't yet "get it" when it comes to the scope of the problem: 6% of parents surveyed said they had a teenager who had abused prescription drugs, while 10% of teens say they have. The awareness will come - but in the meantime, what needs to be done is to make prescription drugs very, very difficult for kids to access. Namely, the prescription drugs in your own home. Locked cabinets are the ticket for the medicine you currently take. But disposal is the Rx for drugs you no longer take. Who among us doesn't have leftover prescription medication just sitting in the medicine cabinet, waiting for...what, exactly? And those are the pills we're least likely to notice if they go missing.
This Saturday, the DEA is holding nationwide "Take-Back" events where you can drop off leftover prescription drugs. (And no, you should not necessarily just flush them down the toilet.) Let me urge you to get in the habit of getting rid of prescription medicine in this way. The most commonly abused are painkillers, sedatives like Xanax, and stimulants like Ritalin, Adderall, and other ADD medications (because they're so plentiful). And, most importantly, think twice about the message you send if you give your kid prescription drugs that were meant for someone else (like another member of the family) - 22% of teens said their parents have done that.
In Carlsbad, the drop-off site is Scripps Coastal Medical Center at 2176 Salk Avenue; in Oceanside, at Tri-City Medical Center, 4002 Vista Way; and in Encinitas, at Scripps Hospital, 354 Santa Fe Drive. For other locations, click here.
Sunday, September 23, 2012
About the Homework Room at The Harbor
At our new midweek program, The Harbor, kids rotate through a large group program, activity choices, and game stations. Because The Harbor is designed for families, we didn't want an entire family to have to miss in case one child had lots of homework on a particular Wednesday night.
So we've set aside a room for homework that allows kids a quiet space to work. Help is available from the adult volunteers in the room. Kids can also choose the homework room if they just want to bring a book to read.
The 4th-6th grade program begins at 6:00 up in Room B-203. The first thing kids do when arriving is sign up for their activity rotation (which runs 6:30-7:00). Kids needing to use the homework room should just sign-in on that clipboard, and then at 6:30 (after the large group program) go with the volunteers to that area. If they don't finish by 7:00 (when activity rotations end and game stations begin), they can stay until 7:30.
So we've set aside a room for homework that allows kids a quiet space to work. Help is available from the adult volunteers in the room. Kids can also choose the homework room if they just want to bring a book to read.
The 4th-6th grade program begins at 6:00 up in Room B-203. The first thing kids do when arriving is sign up for their activity rotation (which runs 6:30-7:00). Kids needing to use the homework room should just sign-in on that clipboard, and then at 6:30 (after the large group program) go with the volunteers to that area. If they don't finish by 7:00 (when activity rotations end and game stations begin), they can stay until 7:30.
Saturday, September 22, 2012
How Do You Measure Spiritual Growth?
American love to measure things. Twice an hour on the radio,
they tell me the level of the Dow Jones and the S&P 500 and the NASDAQ,
plus the price of gold and silver and oil. Every week, competing polls tell us
who’s likely to win the presidential race. We look at fuel efficiency before we
buy a car. We know how many games out of first place our favorite baseball team
is. We can now track kids’ grades in school in near-real time, as scores are
posted online. And the
Census Bureau can tell you how much the average American spends each year
on newspapers, video games, and lottery tickets.
And all for what? While polls and labor statistics are meant
to help leaders make mid-course corrections, the truth is that much measurement
doesn’t matter. As financial planners will tell you, the price of a stock
doesn’t matter until the day you sell it. A good coach reminds his team that
the only score that matters is the final score. And an isolated quiz or
homework score hardly tells the whole picture (which is why wise teachers allow
students to drop their lowest grade from the average). Too-frequent measurement leads to skewed results. Would you like to have the meter running on
everything you did, capturing you on your worst day? The reason we measure is
to analyze – to know “what’s going on” – but if we’re not careful, we can get
bogged down and lose sight of the real goal.
All that to say, when it comes to measuring spiritual growth
and progress (an awful word, as I’ll explain), we need to be very, very
careful. And that’s because spiritual
growth is never an individual endeavor. So if a worker’s productivity is
low, we normally conclude that they need to work harder. If a student’s grades are
low, we conclude they need to study more. If the unemployment rate is high, we
try to create more jobs. And so on.
But “How do you measure spiritual growth?” turns out to be
not the same question as “How do you promote it?” because we aren’t the Spirit! That should be obvious, but it bears
repeating: we are not the Spirit. Instead, we try to be the fertile soil in
which the Spirit can grow, but as Paul wrote in the first letter to the
Corinthian church: “I planted the seed, Apollos watered it, but God made it
grow.”
So what if the “work” of spiritual growth is soil
preparation? That way, any credit for the progress goes to God, and we don’t
pump ourselves up on false notions that it was our hard work or effort that
produced growth. As I wrote last week, just because we might engineer the appearance
of the fruits of the Spirit doesn’t mean anything remotely spiritual or
supernatural is going on.
So what’s helpful to measure? What might we look to as
encouraging signs that spiritual growth is likely to happen? Over the next
three weeks, I’ll be breaking down three markers that might be helpful:
identity, network, and allegiance.
Friday, September 14, 2012
How Do You Nurture Spiritual Growth?
Does anyone know? Has anyone discovered the secret in the 2,000-year history of Christianity? There's no shortage of books or advice-givers, but are we any closer to knowing what really helps kids grow in their faith?
One of the problems is a confusion in terms. Sometimes we talk about "spiritual growth" and "growing in faith" as if they're the same thing. They're not, and the distinction matters because there's a difference between a general spirituality and a Christian spirituality, which is more directed and has a fairly specific object at its center - namely, Jesus Christ.
Let's begin with a few things spiritual nurture is not. It is not behavior modification and it is not character education. Those are similar, but one responds to behaviors and the other tries to get out ahead and shape them. But a spiritual perspective rightly sees behaviors as the overflow of what's inside. We can spend an awful lot of time trying to get kids to fall in love with good behavior. But the Bible makes it pretty clear that our hearts are inclined toward what's wrong, and that observable behavior is no indication of what's going on inside anyhow, and that God values our wholehearted devotion to him, not just outward conformity:
From Isaiah 29:13 - The LORD says: "These people come near to me with their mouth and honor me with their lips, but their hearts are far from me."
1 Samuel 16:7, on the choice of young David over his older brothers: "The LORD does not look at the things man looks at. Man looks at the outward appearance, but the LORD looks at the heart."
Jesus, on the Pharisees' saying that his power was demonic: "Out of the overflow of the heart the mouth speaks. The good man brings good things out of the good stored up in him, and the evil man brings evil things out of the evil stored up in him." (Matt. 12:34-35)
Jesus, on the hypocrisy of the Pharisees and the teachers of the law: "You clean the outside of the cup and dish, but inside they are full of greed and self-indulgence. Blind Pharisee! First clean the inside of the cup and dish, and then the outside also will be clean."
Jesus, warning us about false prophets: "Every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit. A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, and a bad tree cannot bear good fruit." (Matt. 7:17-18)
Paul: "So I say, live by the Spirit, and you will not gratify the desires of the sinful nature. ...The fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness and self-control." (Galatians 5:16, 22-23)
Sometimes we seize on that last one: "Great! The list! If we just teach our kids to do these things, we're on the right track." But not so fast. Look at the whole of what the Bible says about outward behaviors - they come from what's inside. Look closely at the Galatians passage itself. It does not say that by "practicing the fruits of the Spirit" they will become more common. It says those things are fruits - in other words, results - that come not from ourselves, but by the Spirit.
That's an important principle of spiritual growth: it is never an individual pursuit. Maybe at this point I should clarify that this is a principle of Christian spiritual growth. It's one thing to practice openness, to believe in the transcendent, to connect with something outside myself - that's general spirituality. But Christian spirituality involves two living entities. It is always a cooperative effort between a person and God, because - obviously - you cannot have spiritual growth without the Spirit!
What does this mean, then, for spiritual nurture? To me, it defines the task as this: we are both teaching and persuading kids to be open to the movement of the Spirit of God in their lives. Everything we do with them must ultimately serve that end. To stop short at behavior management is to blunt God's influence; to settle for knowing Bible facts or the ritual of prayer without understanding their intent is to pass on a dull religion.
So what is faith, and how do we teach it? I'm not sure we can. Faith is a response to the realization that:
1. God is alive (not merely historical).
2. God is a working God (he's not stagnant).
3. God has intentions that involve me, personally, and that require my willing obedience.
4. These intentions are ultimately for my good.
5. I cannot reap the benefits apart from the work of God.
"Teaching faith" is really teaching those five things above. The response must come from inside - or it's not faith. And, faith also must have a supernatural element to it. It might be conviction, or understanding, or strong belief, but unless it's exercised in a spiritual/supernatural way, it cannot be faith. Why? Because God is spiritual and supernatural! We cannot interface with him in any other way.
It's for this reason that in the area of children's spirituality research, a relatively new emphasis on stimulating wonder and awe in kids has arisen. I was visiting with a children's pastor in Malaysia this summer, and reflecting on how kids' faith differed from that of adults. He spoke volumes of truth when he simply said, "Kids still believe that God can do anything." The trick is to help them, when they are preteens, to make that turn into adult-like thinking while not losing the trust and all-things-are-possible sense that young kids carry around with them.
It comes down to this: do we believe that God is able, and do we believe that He is willing? Thus, the exercise of nurturing spiritual growth begins as a test of our own faith, when we realize that the best thing we can do is prepare the soil of a kid's heart, trusting God to make things grow.
One of the problems is a confusion in terms. Sometimes we talk about "spiritual growth" and "growing in faith" as if they're the same thing. They're not, and the distinction matters because there's a difference between a general spirituality and a Christian spirituality, which is more directed and has a fairly specific object at its center - namely, Jesus Christ.
Let's begin with a few things spiritual nurture is not. It is not behavior modification and it is not character education. Those are similar, but one responds to behaviors and the other tries to get out ahead and shape them. But a spiritual perspective rightly sees behaviors as the overflow of what's inside. We can spend an awful lot of time trying to get kids to fall in love with good behavior. But the Bible makes it pretty clear that our hearts are inclined toward what's wrong, and that observable behavior is no indication of what's going on inside anyhow, and that God values our wholehearted devotion to him, not just outward conformity:
From Isaiah 29:13 - The LORD says: "These people come near to me with their mouth and honor me with their lips, but their hearts are far from me."
1 Samuel 16:7, on the choice of young David over his older brothers: "The LORD does not look at the things man looks at. Man looks at the outward appearance, but the LORD looks at the heart."
Jesus, on the Pharisees' saying that his power was demonic: "Out of the overflow of the heart the mouth speaks. The good man brings good things out of the good stored up in him, and the evil man brings evil things out of the evil stored up in him." (Matt. 12:34-35)
Jesus, on the hypocrisy of the Pharisees and the teachers of the law: "You clean the outside of the cup and dish, but inside they are full of greed and self-indulgence. Blind Pharisee! First clean the inside of the cup and dish, and then the outside also will be clean."
Jesus, warning us about false prophets: "Every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit. A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, and a bad tree cannot bear good fruit." (Matt. 7:17-18)
Paul: "So I say, live by the Spirit, and you will not gratify the desires of the sinful nature. ...The fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness and self-control." (Galatians 5:16, 22-23)
Sometimes we seize on that last one: "Great! The list! If we just teach our kids to do these things, we're on the right track." But not so fast. Look at the whole of what the Bible says about outward behaviors - they come from what's inside. Look closely at the Galatians passage itself. It does not say that by "practicing the fruits of the Spirit" they will become more common. It says those things are fruits - in other words, results - that come not from ourselves, but by the Spirit.
That's an important principle of spiritual growth: it is never an individual pursuit. Maybe at this point I should clarify that this is a principle of Christian spiritual growth. It's one thing to practice openness, to believe in the transcendent, to connect with something outside myself - that's general spirituality. But Christian spirituality involves two living entities. It is always a cooperative effort between a person and God, because - obviously - you cannot have spiritual growth without the Spirit!
What does this mean, then, for spiritual nurture? To me, it defines the task as this: we are both teaching and persuading kids to be open to the movement of the Spirit of God in their lives. Everything we do with them must ultimately serve that end. To stop short at behavior management is to blunt God's influence; to settle for knowing Bible facts or the ritual of prayer without understanding their intent is to pass on a dull religion.
So what is faith, and how do we teach it? I'm not sure we can. Faith is a response to the realization that:
1. God is alive (not merely historical).
2. God is a working God (he's not stagnant).
3. God has intentions that involve me, personally, and that require my willing obedience.
4. These intentions are ultimately for my good.
5. I cannot reap the benefits apart from the work of God.
"Teaching faith" is really teaching those five things above. The response must come from inside - or it's not faith. And, faith also must have a supernatural element to it. It might be conviction, or understanding, or strong belief, but unless it's exercised in a spiritual/supernatural way, it cannot be faith. Why? Because God is spiritual and supernatural! We cannot interface with him in any other way.
It's for this reason that in the area of children's spirituality research, a relatively new emphasis on stimulating wonder and awe in kids has arisen. I was visiting with a children's pastor in Malaysia this summer, and reflecting on how kids' faith differed from that of adults. He spoke volumes of truth when he simply said, "Kids still believe that God can do anything." The trick is to help them, when they are preteens, to make that turn into adult-like thinking while not losing the trust and all-things-are-possible sense that young kids carry around with them.
It comes down to this: do we believe that God is able, and do we believe that He is willing? Thus, the exercise of nurturing spiritual growth begins as a test of our own faith, when we realize that the best thing we can do is prepare the soil of a kid's heart, trusting God to make things grow.
Sunday, September 9, 2012
Your Invitation - 8 Reasons We Think You'll Like The Harbor
Something new is coming to Wednesday nights at NCCC. It's called The Harbor, and I think it's going to be a hit. More than that, though, I think it's good ministry.
The two aren't the same. In church ministry, we can get hooked on the new, the trending, or the popular - but that doesn't mean it's great ministry. To me, good ministry satisfies two conditions: it maximizes its impact during the event itself (small group, large group, off-site event, or whatever), and, that impact spills over beyond the event. It's great to hear when people say they were touched or changed by something that happened at an event. But when they continue to be changed - that's how you know you've hit on something with power.
To me, events or classes that we can do with parents and kids together - actually interacting in a purposeful way, and then reflecting on it - are #1. This is what we try to do in the "What's the Story?" class (which returns in early 2013) and in PG-13, the class for early adolescents and parents. The second most powerful is giving parents the tools to disciple and lead their kids, or simply to become healthier themselves.
The Harbor fits that second class. When we decided to try a family-focused midweek program, we discovered that there is no shortage of classes and studies out there to help parents. And we're pretty excited to see the interest level so far. Not that the kid program takes a back seat, either. This has been a season of dreaming and envisioning the possible...and now it's time to roll it out.
Here are some features of The Harbor that we think will be especially attractive to you:
1. The Family Meal. We recognized that on many Wednesday nights, kids were coming to the midweek program without having eaten dinner - no time! So we'll be serving a family-style meal at 5:30 pm, which will give parents one less thing they have to take care of that night.
2. The Family Meal. Yes, I repeat myself! The second benefit to the family meal is that families get a chance to connect with each other. Our church draws from a vast area; many cities, many schools. And we know it's hard to know others and be known...unless you are able to slow down. When we're able to slow down (which we always do during a meal), we tend to get beyond the surface questions and to a place of meaningful conversation.
3. The Homework/Quiet Room. We also recognized that having homework kept kids away some nights from the midweek program. So, we're setting aside one room just for that, and it'll be staffed by volunteers who can help out. Or, if kids want to bring a book and just read for part or all of the night, that's ok too.
4. The flexibility of the kids' program. In the past, we had kids sign up for six-week electives. This made it hard to bring a friend, because electives could fill and it wasn't easy to begin midway through the six weeks. We've changed this so it'll be possible to jump in at any time.
5. Kids get to make choices. Let me explain why this is a benefit. If we want kids to make good choices when faced with big important decisions, we need to give them practice at making decisions, period. Learning to make up your mind is part of growing up, and not until kids have skill in doing this will they really take over their own spiritual lives and grow. "You mean, even choosing something like the game they want to play makes a difference?" That's exactly what I mean. When kids are trusted to make choices of all shapes and sizes, they come to understand that the choices they make matter - that life doesn't "just happen" to them. We need to reinforce this wherever possible. So the kids' program is full of choice. 4th-6th graders will start all together, but then have a 30 minute block of hands-on learning activities and a 30 minute block of games.
6. Kids get to make choices - part two. When kids try many different things, they discover what they like and don't like. They discover what they're good at. They develop hobbies, which causes them to meet others with similar interests. Trying new things is part of healthy development. Our hope is that kids will want to try all of the activities. We suspect, of course, that they'll latch on to the couple they really like, which is ok too.
7. Parents will meet and share with other parents. We chose the classes we did because each has a different focus and is intended for different groups of parents. "Hope and Help for the Single Mom" is of course for single moms, while "Raising a Modern-Day Knight" is meant for dads who have sons. Jeff Reinke's "Parenting from the Heart" will feature his insights on shaping the heart of your child and connecting with them at a deeper level (and look for special sessions with Archibald Hart and Sharon May as part of that class, too), while "Raising Kids With a Faith that Lasts" is specifically about guiding your kids' spiritual development. Of course, the content of the presentations is helpful - but the added benefit (this is the part that "spills over" outside of class) is that parents develop a support network of other parents.
8. Big church becomes small. We're a big church. Sitting in weekend services in the midst of a large crowd can be very cool. But everyone needs to be known. Christians need a network of other Christians. There are many ministries in the church that try to make this happen. The Harbor will be one of them.
Will we see you on September 19? I hope so. Visit this page for registration.
The two aren't the same. In church ministry, we can get hooked on the new, the trending, or the popular - but that doesn't mean it's great ministry. To me, good ministry satisfies two conditions: it maximizes its impact during the event itself (small group, large group, off-site event, or whatever), and, that impact spills over beyond the event. It's great to hear when people say they were touched or changed by something that happened at an event. But when they continue to be changed - that's how you know you've hit on something with power.
To me, events or classes that we can do with parents and kids together - actually interacting in a purposeful way, and then reflecting on it - are #1. This is what we try to do in the "What's the Story?" class (which returns in early 2013) and in PG-13, the class for early adolescents and parents. The second most powerful is giving parents the tools to disciple and lead their kids, or simply to become healthier themselves.
The Harbor fits that second class. When we decided to try a family-focused midweek program, we discovered that there is no shortage of classes and studies out there to help parents. And we're pretty excited to see the interest level so far. Not that the kid program takes a back seat, either. This has been a season of dreaming and envisioning the possible...and now it's time to roll it out.
Here are some features of The Harbor that we think will be especially attractive to you:
1. The Family Meal. We recognized that on many Wednesday nights, kids were coming to the midweek program without having eaten dinner - no time! So we'll be serving a family-style meal at 5:30 pm, which will give parents one less thing they have to take care of that night.
2. The Family Meal. Yes, I repeat myself! The second benefit to the family meal is that families get a chance to connect with each other. Our church draws from a vast area; many cities, many schools. And we know it's hard to know others and be known...unless you are able to slow down. When we're able to slow down (which we always do during a meal), we tend to get beyond the surface questions and to a place of meaningful conversation.
3. The Homework/Quiet Room. We also recognized that having homework kept kids away some nights from the midweek program. So, we're setting aside one room just for that, and it'll be staffed by volunteers who can help out. Or, if kids want to bring a book and just read for part or all of the night, that's ok too.
4. The flexibility of the kids' program. In the past, we had kids sign up for six-week electives. This made it hard to bring a friend, because electives could fill and it wasn't easy to begin midway through the six weeks. We've changed this so it'll be possible to jump in at any time.
5. Kids get to make choices. Let me explain why this is a benefit. If we want kids to make good choices when faced with big important decisions, we need to give them practice at making decisions, period. Learning to make up your mind is part of growing up, and not until kids have skill in doing this will they really take over their own spiritual lives and grow. "You mean, even choosing something like the game they want to play makes a difference?" That's exactly what I mean. When kids are trusted to make choices of all shapes and sizes, they come to understand that the choices they make matter - that life doesn't "just happen" to them. We need to reinforce this wherever possible. So the kids' program is full of choice. 4th-6th graders will start all together, but then have a 30 minute block of hands-on learning activities and a 30 minute block of games.
6. Kids get to make choices - part two. When kids try many different things, they discover what they like and don't like. They discover what they're good at. They develop hobbies, which causes them to meet others with similar interests. Trying new things is part of healthy development. Our hope is that kids will want to try all of the activities. We suspect, of course, that they'll latch on to the couple they really like, which is ok too.
7. Parents will meet and share with other parents. We chose the classes we did because each has a different focus and is intended for different groups of parents. "Hope and Help for the Single Mom" is of course for single moms, while "Raising a Modern-Day Knight" is meant for dads who have sons. Jeff Reinke's "Parenting from the Heart" will feature his insights on shaping the heart of your child and connecting with them at a deeper level (and look for special sessions with Archibald Hart and Sharon May as part of that class, too), while "Raising Kids With a Faith that Lasts" is specifically about guiding your kids' spiritual development. Of course, the content of the presentations is helpful - but the added benefit (this is the part that "spills over" outside of class) is that parents develop a support network of other parents.
8. Big church becomes small. We're a big church. Sitting in weekend services in the midst of a large crowd can be very cool. But everyone needs to be known. Christians need a network of other Christians. There are many ministries in the church that try to make this happen. The Harbor will be one of them.
Will we see you on September 19? I hope so. Visit this page for registration.
Saturday, September 1, 2012
Because Girlfriends Care, so do kids
One of the most common questions I get from parents regards how to get their kids to serve. The benefits of serving others are undeniable. At the very least, you walk away feeling fortunate to have what you have. But how do we build that into kids, whose worlds are so small?
I'm not a big fan of
schools compelling volunteer service hours as a condition of graduation, for a
number of reasons. Chief among them is the obvious: if they have to do it, it's
not volunteer. And when we do anything because we have to do it, it changes the
way we approach the work. I also don’t like the negative assumption buried in
the requirement, which is that given a choice, students won’t help out. To the
contrary, helping others has become somewhat en vogue. Kids and teenagers have done great things on behalf of
others, like this and this and this. Maybe we just needed to ask.
But another reason kids and
teenagers don’t serve is that they don’t know what opportunities are out there.
I’m an adult, and I’m still sometimes shocked about the level of need and the
kinds of need that are here, right on our doorstep in North County.
A number of years ago, a
group of moms who’d formed a Bible study decided they didn’t want to just sit
around and talk each week – they wanted to take action. This was the start of
what is now a 501(c)3 organization called “Girlfriends Care”. Naturally, they
brought their kids along on these service projects, and Girlfriends Care
quickly spawned Kidz Care, too. Ellen Clark has been quietly organizing service
opportunities for the last several years, and will e-mail me from time to time
about their latest project.
There’s so much I admire,
not just about what this group is doing, but in the way they’re going about it.
First of all, the opportunities to help are many, and varied. People have
different giftings, and some enjoy helping in one way but not others. Secondly,
they steer away from guilt in motivating people. As Ellen says in her latest
e-mail: “GFC was founded on the principles of no-guilt and supporting busy
people like you in balancing their lives as they find ways to give unto
others. Always an opportunity, never an obligation.”
The third reason I like
what they’re doing is that they’re flexible. As the kids involved have grown
older, they’ve recognized that the kids (now teenagers) need different
opportunities. I think too often in the church we insist that youth continue to
conform to the structures we’ve built, rather than recognizing that the face fo
their institutions will be different – and that’s ok. To this end, Girlfriends
Care has invited 13 other community service organizations to come out to an event this Saturday and set up booths, in hopes of finding willing volunteers to meet their
needs.
This effort is genuinely
unselfish, and as I said, there’s no guilt involved. You could bring your kids
to one event, or many. But the fourth reason I like Girlfriends Care’s efforts
is that it’s the heart of the organizers to be serving alongside kids in
whatever they do. So they don’t ask kids to get their hands dirty or to give
their time without being willing to do the same themselves. This is probably
the most effective way to encourage hearts of compassion: to be the change we
want to see.
Feelings aren’t contagious;
guilt and compulsion only appear to work. If we really want our kids to care,
it starts with them being aware that there are needs at all. Do your kids know
there are homeless children and teens in San Diego County? Are they aware of
what Bread of Life does? Have they heard the words, “Human Trafficking,” and
know that slavery isn’t just a Civil War-era relic?
It’s not that kids don’t
care. Kids care about all kinds of things. But we don’t tend to care about
things we don’t think about. It’s too easy to bury things that are troubling or
inconvenient. To draw them past the line of apathy means that we, ourselves,
need to be where those needs are.
Website for GirlfriendsCare (site is being rebuilt as of 9/1/12)
Website for Kidz Care &Teens Care They keep a calendar of events as well as descriptions of ongoing projects
here: book drives, food drives, clothing drives, etc.
Girlfriends Care Luncheon:
This Saturday, September 7, 11-1:30 in downtown Carlsbad. See details here.
Includes booths from 15 exhibitors. The event is designed to help potential
volunteers find places where they might want to serve. Kids, men, teenagers are
welcome – it’s not just an event for women.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)